Cases 91 - 100 of 10,290
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SmarterSwipe, Inc. v. Navarrete et al
as 2:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
SmarterSwipe, Inc.
Defendant:
Carlos Navarrete, Carem Arrhimi, Ethan Belloli-Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tamir Abdullah v. State of California et al.
as 5:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Tamir Abdullah
Defendant:
State of California, Michael Ramos, Eddy Lange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viegas et al v. Partner Colorado Credit Union et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Keri Lynn Viegas, Keri L. Viegas and James Viegas
Defendant:
Partner Colorado Credit Union, Harry L. Simon, Danielle L Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burt v. Ramos et al
as 3:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Jamel Burt
Defendant:
Nicolai Ramos and County of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Ramos-Funes, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2205
Petitioner:
DOMINGO RAMOS-FUNES and OSIAS MOISES RAMOS-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
