Cases 91 - 100 of 939
Ramos v. Onondaga County District Attorney's Office
as 5:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Paul Ramos
Defendant:
Onondaga County District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. People
as 9:2022cv00764
Petitioner:
Paul Ramos
Respondent:
People
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Komatsu v. Ramos
as 1:2022cv06076
Plaintiff:
Towaki Komatsu
Defendant:
Edgardo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
loanDepot.com, LLC v. CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv05971
Plaintiff:
loanDepot.com, LLC
Defendant:
CrossCountry Mortgage, LLC, Keisha Antoine, Scott Bonora and others
Ramos v. Zoffoli et al
as 1:2022cv04077
Plaintiff:
Claudia Ramos
Defendant:
Darin Zoffoli, Steven Behar, Heath Hill and others
Ramos v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv05866
Plaintiff:
Ashly Ramos
Defendant:
City Of New York, Arhenis Lopezestevez and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. All Island Paving Co., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv03959
Plaintiff:
Franklin Ramos
Defendant:
All Island Paving Co., Inc., Robert Keghlian, Sr. and Robert Keghlian
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ramos v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv05695
Plaintiff:
Cruz Manuel Ramos and FNU LNU
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Juarez-Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2022cv03647
Plaintiff:
Hilarion Juarez-Ramos
Defendant:
"John Doe" and J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Martinez et al v. RSG Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03469
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Sandino Martinez, Solin Antonio Escalante Torres, Dalmacio Enriquez Hernandez and others
Defendant:
RSG Construction Corp., NYC Line Contractors Inc., Harjit Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
