Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00376
Plaintiff:
Clausell Brown
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and United Parcel Service Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Airline Crash
Mbogo v. Aramark et al
as 5:2026cv00179
Plaintiff:
Michelle Mbogo
Defendant:
Aramark, Aramark Services, Inc., ARAMARK Campus, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. v. Coleman
as 3:2026cv00036
Plaintiff:
Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
Defendant:
Russell Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Penick v. Tindell et al
as 3:2026cv00339
Plaintiff:
Antoyne Maurice Penick
Defendant:
Jailer Jeff Tindell, Oldham County Detention Ctr. and United States Marshall Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perry v. Lewis et al
as 3:2026cv00334
Plaintiff:
John M. Perry
Defendant:
Stephanie Lewis, Hon. Lauren Adams Ogden, Commonwealth's Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
