Cases 91 - 100 of 257
In re: Alton Brown, et al
as 10-4544
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, WILLIAM STICKMAN, LOUIS S. FOLINO and others
ANDERSON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2010cv01565
Petitioner:
THOMAS RAY ANDERSON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, TOM CORBETT and MARK AARON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PISKANIN v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00299
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JAMES B. MARTIN and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SCHAFFER v. CAMERON et al
as 3:2010cv00294
Petitioner:
PAUL LEN SCHAFFER
Respondent:
KENNETH CAMERON, JEFFREY D. BURKETT and TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EDE v. SAUERS et al
as 5:2010cv06824
Petitioner:
JEFFREY ALAN EDE
Respondent:
DEBRA K. SAUERS, JAMES B. MARTIN, TOM CORBETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WAGMAN v. CHERBA et al
as 2:2010cv01496
Plaintiff:
PHILIP GARY WAGMAN
Defendant:
LAWRENCE CHERBA, LAWRENCE FUKSA, ANDREW DEMAREST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In Re: Michael Piskanin, Jr.
as 10-4255
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Respondent:
REPUBLICAN PARTY PA, LEHIGH CTY REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILLIAM H. PLATT, III, Esq. Individually and As Chairman Republican Party of Lehigh County and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JOHN R PADOVA
ABERU v. FISHER et al
as 2:2010cv05515
Petitioner:
MARIO ABERU
Respondent:
JON D. FISHER, TOM CORBETT and THE ACTING DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF NORTHUMBERLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FAVORS v. PENNA. DEPT. OF CORRECTION (DOC). et al
as 1:2010cv02123
Petitioner:
Percy Favors
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections , Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole and Tom Corbett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MARTIN v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2010cv05338
Petitioner:
ANDRE MARTIN
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
