Cases 91 - 100 of 105
Larkins v. Toledo et al
as 3:2011cv30001
Defendant:
Julio M. Toledo, City of Springfield, Massachusetts, Richard Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Guy Larkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv11837
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Torres
as 3:2010cv30075
Plaintiff:
Nixida Natal Torres
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pruell et al v. Caritas Christi et al
as 1:2009cv11722
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Pruell, Ashleigh Pruell, Amy Gordon and others
Defendant:
Caritas Christi, Caritas Christi, Caritas Christi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Torres v. City of Fitchburg et al
as 4:2009cv11651
Defendant:
City of Fitchburg, City of Fitchburg, Michael J. Sevigny and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Torres v. City of Fitchburg et al
as 1:2009cv11651
Defendant:
City of Fitchburg, City of Fitchburg, Michael J. Sevigny and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pruell et al v. Caritas Christi et al
as 1:2009cv11466
Plaintiff:
Ashleigh Pruell, Ashleigh Pruell, Amy Gordon and others
Defendant:
Caritas Christi, Caritas Christi Network Services, Caritas Carney Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv30113
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10581
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv10501
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
