Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 359
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv04119
Plaintiff: ABC Appliance, Inc., P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Neco Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv01426
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff: Neco Alliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv03856
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD and others
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC vs. Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.,
as 2:2015cv00170
Plaintiff: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Defendant: Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC v. ADT LLC
as 2:2015cv00156
Plaintiff: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Defendant: ADT LLC
Consol_plaintiff: Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Consol_defendant: Philips Electronics North America Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc., Belkin International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Epson Imaging Devices Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00117
Not Classified By Court: Viewsonic Corporation and Nassau Suffolk Lumber & Supply
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, CMO Japan CO., LTD, Toshiba Matsushita Display Technology, LTD. and others
Plaintiff: Douglas C. Giordan, Electrograph Technologies, Corp. and Electrograph Systems, Inc.
Claimant: State Board of Equalization of the State of California
Intervenor: NEC LCD Technologies, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
In re: Ira Erwin, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 12-16780
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Appellant: IRA CONNER ERWIN
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15930
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Appellant: MARIA MARSHALL, GERI MAXWELL, WAYNE MARSHALL and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Keena Dale, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-16216
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Appellant: KEENA DALE
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Indirect Plaintiff Class, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 13-15920
Defendant / Appellee: EPSON IMAGING DEVICES CORPORATION, NEC DISPLAY SOLUTIONS OF AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG SDI AMERICA, INC. and others
Not Classified By Court: In re: TFT-LCD, (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF WISCONSIN, SPECTRUM SETTLEMENT RECOVERY and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: INDIRECT PLAINTIFF CLASS
Appellant: CBC, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?