Cases 91 - 100 of 100
Griffin v. Wingard et al
as 3:2013cv00131
Petitioner:
Leroy Griffin
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prout v. Wingard
as 3:2012cv02471
Petitioner:
Joseph Prout
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FRANKLIN v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2012cv06239
Petitioner:
RONALD FRANKLIN
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Prout v. Wingard et al
as 3:2012cv01901
Petitioner:
Joseph Prout
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmonds v. Wingard et al
as 1:2012cv01898
Petitioner:
Everson J. Simmonds
Respondent:
Trevor Wingard and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CANDELARIO v. SCI LAUREL HIGHLANDS et al
as 3:2012cv00120
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO CANDELARIO
Defendant:
SCI LAUREL HIGHLANDS, TREVOR WINGARD, SERGEANT WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOODWIN v. WINGARD
as 2:2011cv01460
Petitioner:
TYRONE ALEXANDER GOODWIN
Respondent:
TREVOR WINGARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CALDWELL v. THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AGENCY et al
as 2:2011cv01001
Plaintiff:
CLAY CALDWELL
Defendant:
THE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS AGENCY, JOHN WETZEL, DORINA VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLATTS v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2009cv00029
Plaintiff:
DAVID MICHAEL GLATTS
Defendant:
LOCKETT, MATTHEWS, CAIRINS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NORTH v. WINGARD et al
as 2:2008cv01398
Plaintiff:
SCOTT N. NORTH
Defendant:
TREVOR WINGARD, ROBERT STANKO, JAMES SCEKERES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
