Cases 91 - 100 of 247
Bradley Burchfield v. Joe Jones, et al
as 21-1612
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Barry A. Bryant, Lieutenant Stapleton, Jerry Bradshaw, Arkansas Community Corrections Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bradley C. Burchfield
Nour v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Sgt. (f/n/u) Johnson, A. Gilbert, Davidson County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Abdulrahman Nour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Sanders v. Trinity Services Group Incorpo, et al
as 21-15333
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS MOODY, DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, DE LEON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL MARTIN SANDERS
McCreight v Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00151
Defendant:
David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Plaintiff:
Kevin McCreight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kunkle v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00155
Defendant:
David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kunkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKissick v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00160
Plaintiff:
Andrew McKissick
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Plaintiff:
Cedric D. Allen
Defendant:
David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eglseder v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00159
Defendant:
David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Plaintiff:
John Eglseder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenton v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Richard Watson, Dr. David Marcowitz and Trinity Service Group
Plaintiff:
Trevon Fenton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gannon v. Watson et al
as 3:2021cv00169
Plaintiff:
George Gannon
Defendant:
Dr. David Marcowitz, Richard Watson and Trinity Service Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
