Cases 91 - 100 of 6,532
King County v. Purdue Pharma, LP et al
as 1:2018op45231
Defendant:
Allergan PLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
King County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
as 1:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
CORCEPT THERAPEUTICS, INC.
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS INDUSTRIES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-420
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, Albertsons Companies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-410
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Rite Aid Corporation, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-418
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company, KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc, UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc., H-E-B L.P., The Kroger Co. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
In re: In re Bystolic Antitrust Litigation
as 23-423
Debtor:
In re: Watson Laboratories, Inc.
Plaintiff:
UFCW local 1500 Welfare Fund, Teamsters Western Region & Local 177 Health Care Plan, Fraternal Order Of Police Miami Lodge 20, Insurance Trust Fund and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
J M Smith Corporation, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, DBA Smith Drug Company and KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated also known as Kinney Drugs, Inc
Defendant / Appellee:
Forest Laboratories Inc., Forest Laboratories Ireland, LTD, Forest Laboratories Holdings Ltd. and others
Benton v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv22834
Plaintiff:
Jordan Benton
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International (GmbH), Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WESSON v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2023cv02342
Plaintiff:
EMMETT WESSON
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD., HETERO DRUGS LTD., HETERO LABS, LTD. and others
In Re:
VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Valsartan Losartan and Irbesartan Products
as 23-8005
Not Classified By Court:
In re: IN RE: VALSARTAN LOSARTAN AND IRBESARTAN PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ZHEJIANG HUAHAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD., HUAHAI U.S. INC, PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC and others
Respondent:
CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS, THIRD-PARTY PAYOR PLAINTIFFS and MEDICAL MONITORING PLAINTIFFS
Not Yet Classified:
PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL INC
AbbVie Inc. et al v. Alkem Laboratories Limited et al
as 1:2022cv01423
Plaintiff:
AbbVie Inc., AbbVie Ltd. and Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc.
Defendant:
Alkem Laboratories Limited, Hetero Labs Limited, Hetero Labs Limited Unit-V and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
