Cases 91 - 100 of 709
Ozuna v. Rosenberg
as 3:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Carlos P. Ozuna
Respondent:
FCI Oxford, Warden and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cook v. Moore et al
as 2:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Timothy W Cook
Defendant:
Sgt Moore, CO Van Natta, Capt Tervonen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lathan, Darek v. Emmerich, E.
as 3:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Darek Lathan
Respondent:
Warden E. Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hughes v. McDermott
as 2:2024cv00270
Petitioner:
Etter L Hughes
Respondent:
Warden Jennifer McDermott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Love v. Prosper et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Bridgette Prosper, Yanu Pusich, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Meisner
as 2:2024cv00236
Petitioner:
Charles Brown
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Wenger et al
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Robert Jay Ward
Defendant:
Erin Wenger, Haseleu, CO Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKinney v. Gierach et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Petitioner:
William McKinney
Respondent:
Warden Cromwell, Greg Giese, Angela Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yefferson v. Warden FCI Oxford
as 3:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Yefferson
Respondent:
Warden FCI Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
