Cases 91 - 100 of 18,403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
AYERS v. CALLAHAN et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
JARON AYERS
Defendant:
BLAKE CALLAHAN and TOWN OF CHESTERFIELD, IN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taebel v. Biden
as 2:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
FITTS v. QUAKENBUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
SHANNA CHEATHAM FITTS
Defendant:
SHERIFF DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, SERGEANT PATRICK CLENNON, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. Prop and Rotor Management LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Chloe Sullivan
Defendant:
Prop and Rotor Management LLC, Penny P Properties LLC d/b/a NWIRENTAL.COM, Gary Fund 2 LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
RUBY v. STILLER et al
as 4:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. RUBY
Defendant:
CARRIE STILLER, WILLIAM GRAY, AMANDA C. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taebel v. Indiana State of et al
as 2:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric Holcomb and Rokita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
