Cases 91 - 100 of 157,216
JORDAN v. WARD et al
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANK JORDAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, SHARON LEWIS, DR AYDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MITCHELL v. WEST et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
BRANDYN MITCHELL
Defendant:
J WEST and M NEAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rosa v. State of Florida
as 8:2024cv01057
Plaintiff:
Tony Reno Rosa
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudgins-Verellen v. Merritt et al
as 8:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Hope Hudgins-Verellen
Defendant:
Daniel Merritt, Jr. and C. Juergensmeyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barcelona v. Rundle et al
as 3:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Joel Barcelona
Defendant:
Katherine Fernandez Rundle and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv01152
Petitioner:
Alan Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JENKINS v. WALMART et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
SCOTTIE BERNARD JENKINS
Defendant:
WALMART and BRANDON GARRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Gwinnett County Police et al
as 1:2024cv02067
Plaintiff:
Kirk Michael Fields
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Police, Officer Bishop, Officer Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goolst, Jeffrey Steven v. Dr. Marcos
as 9:2024cv80317
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Steven Goolst
Defendant:
Dr. Marcos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Lyons v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Orange)
as 6:2024cv00733
Petitioner:
James E. Lyons
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
