Cases 91 - 100 of 7,523
Cavazos-De Fuente v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2024cv00057
Petitioner:
Ulises Cavazos-De Fuente and Ulises Cavazos-De La Fuente
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. Elliott
as 5:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tucker Lewis
Defendant:
Jailer Kelli Elliott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyer v. Ray
as 2:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Keith J. Boyer
Defendant:
Shawnee Ray and Kenton County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bush v. Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
J. Gilley, BOP and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. Akers
as 6:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
Robert Curry
Respondent:
Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malloy v. USA
as 6:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
Aaron Malloy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. USA
as 6:2024cv00013
Petitioner:
Zachary Harris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knox v. Lexington Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Abner J. Knox
Respondent:
Lexington Police Department, Officer Hundley and Officer Haggerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Civil Rights - Bivens Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
