Cases 91 - 100 of 2,227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Phillips v. United States Federal Govt et al
as 7:2023cv00476
Plaintiff:
Douglas B. Phillips, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Federal Govt, Suffolk, NY and State of N.Y.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas v. Virginia Department of Transportation
as 1:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Mary Wanjiku Thomas
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Transportation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Coleman v. Clear et al
as 1:2023cv00022
Plaintiff:
Christopher Coleman
Defendant:
Stephen Clear, Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority and Unknown "SWVRJA DOES"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Stanley v. Bocock
as 7:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Stanley
Defendant:
Christopher T. Bocock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
