Cases 101 - 110 of 27,409
CURTIS v. COMHAR, INC.
as 2:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
BRITTNEY CURTIS
Defendant:
COMHAR, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
ALLEN v. ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDRE ALLEN doing business as ALLEN & SONS PRESERVATION
Defendant:
ASSERO SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PERRY v. L&J TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES, INC.
as 2:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
DORYAL PERRY
Defendant:
L&J TRANSPORTATION COMPANIES, INC.
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN v. BARTHOLOMEW et al
as 2:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE GREATER PENNSYLVANIA CARPENTERS' MEDICAL PLAN
Defendant:
JUSTIN BARTHOLOMEW and CASEY BARTHOLOMEW
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
TRUSCELLO v. BGC 135 9TH STREET, INC. d/b/a RICKS CABARET, et al
as 2:2024cv00558
Plaintiff:
SHAYNA TRUSCELLO
Defendant:
BGC 135 9TH STREET, INC. d/b/a RICKS CABARET, and PAUL COLLELA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
LAGARD v. APPALACHIAN FIELD SERVICE, LLC
as 2:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LAGARD
Defendant:
APPALACHIAN FIELD SERVICE, LLC
MORRETT v. BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
as 1:2024cv04879
Plaintiff:
GREG MORRETT
Defendant:
BRIGHTVIEW HOLDINGS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
DIAZ v. AMAZON, INC.
as 3:2024cv04883
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Diaz
Defendant:
AMAZON.COM SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Thompson v. CLEVELAND-CLIFFS PLATE LLC
as 2:2024cv01528
Plaintiff:
Carelton M. Thompson
Defendant:
CLEVELAND-CLIFFS PLATE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Account Receivable
DAVIS v. TOTAL SECURITY RESOURCES GROUP INC.
as 3:2024cv04824
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL DAVIS
Defendant:
TOTAL SECURITY RESOURCES GROUP INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
