Cases 101 - 110 of 725
USA v. Approximately $30,690.00 in US Currency
as 3:2020cv00209
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Approximately $30,690.00 in US Currency
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY, $6,140.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2020cv00312
Defendant:
CURRENCY, $6,140.00 IN U.S.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
United States of America v. Real Property Located at 2740 Lytham Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
as 3:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Real Property Located at 2740 Lytham Drive, Charlotte, North Carolina
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. Approximately $3,953 in United States Currency
as 5:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Approximately $3,953 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Approximately $166,251.77 United State Currency
as 3:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Approximately $166,251.77 United State Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. 300 S. Pearl Street
as 4:2020cv00021
Defendant:
300 S. Pearl Street
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
USA v. Approximately $99,803.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2019cv00713
Defendant:
Approximately $9,688.00 in United States Currency and Approximately $99,803.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
Claimant:
Gam To
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY, $20,295.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2019cv01171
Defendant:
CURRENCY, $20,295.00 IN U.S.
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
USA v. Approximately $146,000.00 in Currency et al
as 3:2019cv00647
Defendant:
Approximately $239,358.00 in Currency and Approximately $146,000.00 in Currency
Plaintiff:
USA
United States of America v. Approximately $60,110.00 in United States Currency
as 3:2019cv00635
Defendant:
Approximately $60,110.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
