Cases 101 - 110 of 2,178
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Perez et al
as 1:2023cv00363
Plaintiff:
Elliott Williams
Defendant:
S Perez, B . Smith, J Goodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Quinonez v. Perez et al
as 3:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Judith Quinonez
Defendant:
Isaias Perez and Tournesol Siteworks, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prum Holdings, L.L.C. v. Federal National Mortgage Association et al
as 4:2023cv02692
Plaintiff:
Prum Holdings, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Federal National Mortgage Association, Jerry Perez, as Substitute Trustee, Jerry Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Crowley v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00201
Plaintiff:
Michael Crowley
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Asst Warden Samaniego and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00183
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Perez v. Safeco Insurance Company
as 5:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Irene Perez
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Perez v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
Albert Perez
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association and Fay Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
