Cases 101 - 110 of 250
Morris #168303 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00093
Petitioner:
Gabriel Christopher Morris
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Peoples v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00860
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Morris Peoples, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv00802
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Catherine Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Basta #226043 v. Rode et al
as 2:2018cv04363
Defendant:
Unknown Morris, Unknown Troman, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Sameh Basta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03975
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Shereber Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03858
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Timothy C Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zigler v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv03591
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Morris D Zigler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv03576
Defendant:
Bill Gates, Clint Hickman, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Demarlon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv03225
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Maricopa County Correctional Health Services and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2018cv03120
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Maricopa, County of
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
