Cases 101 - 110 of 112
Gregory Bevel v. Charles Ryan
as 17-72929
Petitioner:
GREGORY ALLEN BEVEL
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Michael Weeks v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17133
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY WEEKS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Thomas Pierce v. Subolt Shroff, et al
as 17-17118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS MICHAEL PIERCE
Defendant - Appellee:
SUBOLT SHROFF, Doctor/ Medical Provider at A.S.P.C. Florence, CORIZON LLC, Health Care at Florence/ Eyman, CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and others
Guardian News & Media LLC, et al v. Charles Ryan
as 17-17083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GUARDIAN NEWS & MEDIA LLC, ASSOCIATED PRESS, ARIZONA REPUBLIC, a division of Phoenix Newspapers Incorporated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of the Arizona Department of Corrections
William Qualls v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17030
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM KENNETH QUALLS
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Efren Garcia v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 17-17021
Petitioner - Appellant:
EFREN ORTIZ GARCIA
Respondent - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Genaro Maduena v. Charles Ryan
as 17-72666
Petitioner:
GENARO LOPEZ MADUENA
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Frank Garcia v. Charles Ryan
as 17-72558
Petitioner:
FRANK NUNEZ GARCIA
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Rosalio Beltran v. Charles Ryan
as 17-72094
Petitioner:
ROSALIO DELGADO BELTRAN
Respondent:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden
Michael Fuqua v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 16-15597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY FUQUA, AKA Michael Fuqua
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Warden, Director of ADC Central Office, CAMIT, Correctional Officer II at Special Management Unit #1, FRANCISCO, CO III at SMU #1 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
