Cases 101 - 109 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00360
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HALL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2009cv00783
Plaintiff:
CARLA M. HALL
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
GRESK v. CASTILLO GARCIA et al
as 1:2009cv00774
Plaintiff:
PAUL D. GRESK
Defendant:
J.A. CASTILLO GARCIA, CARLA K. PITTS and MICHAEL S. KURA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 (c)(1) Findings, Concl. & Proposed Judgment
Boelsen et al v. Eli Lilly and Company
as 4:2008cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L Boelsen, Jason L Boelsen, Jason L Boelsen and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Eli Lilly and Company and Eli Lilly and Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SMELSER v. AIS SERVICES, LLC
as 1:2008cv00251
Plaintiff:
CARLA SMELSER
Defendant:
AIS SERVICES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hughes v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 3:2007cv00617
Plaintiff:
Alan Jerome Hughes
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Carla Foster, Mrs Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STUCKEY et al v. GIBSON COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2007cv00326
Plaintiff:
RUSTY C STUCKEY and DAVID W BREDEMEIER
Defendant:
GIBSON COUNTY JAIL, QUENTIN EMMERSON and CARLA BRASELTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARISH v. HARMON et al
as 2:2007cv00254
Plaintiff:
DAVID PARISH, SR
Defendant:
R. ALLEN HARMON, GIBSON COUNTY JAIL, CARLA BRASSELTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Himelick et al
as 1:2007cv00016
Plaintiff:
Michael D Bryant
Defendant:
Darryll Lee Himelick, Sugar, Hoslizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
