Cases 101 - 110 of 163
Ellis et al v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2012cv03089
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ellis and Amber O'Neil
Defendant:
Michael C Williams, City of Akron and John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ragsdale v. Sidoti et al
as 5:2012cv02484
Plaintiff:
Jacob E Ragsdale
Defendant:
Joseph Sidoti, City of Akron and Akron Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Dalessandro v City of Akron, et al
as 5:2012cv02361
Plaintiff:
Shawn J Dalessandro
Defendant:
City of Akron , Officer M Dietrick , Officer M Akers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Louis Dana Gradisher v City of Akron, et al
as 5:2012cv02362
Plaintiff:
Louis Dana Gradisher
Defendant:
City of Akron , Matthew Hackathorn , Jeffrey P. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Copeland v. City of Akron et al
as 5:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Copeland
Defendant:
City of Akron and Judge R R Clunk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah Watkins v. City of Akron
as 11-4179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SARAH WATKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF AKRON
Robinson et al v. Deep Dark Order of Seducees et al
as 5:2011cv02307
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Robinson, Jr., Thomas P. Creisa, Evelyn Price and others
Defendant:
Deep Dark Order of Seducees, Worldwide Order, Satanic Order and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Savick v. City of Akron, Ohio et al
as 5:2011cv02061
Plaintiff:
Walter H. Savick
Defendant:
City of Akron, Ohio and Akron Civil Service Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3752
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
