Cases 101 - 110 of 424
Lopez v. Trani, et al
as 12-1286
Petitioner - Appellant:
VICTOR LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
TRAVIS TRANI, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Alvarez v. Chapdelaine, et al
as 12-1232
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAMMY MICHAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
MR. CHAPDELAINE and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cheeks v. Zupan, et al
as 12-1183
Petitioner - Appellant:
CALVIN KARL CHEEKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DAVID ZUPAN and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stapleton v. Rix et al
as 1:2012cv01153
Plaintiff:
John J. Stapleton
Defendant:
T.J. Rix, Tere Hayward, Mesa County of Colorado Code Compliance Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983
In re: Shattuck
as 12-1114
Petitioner:
BERNARD SHATTUCK
Respondent:
ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS and THE COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jackson v. Hannen, et al
as 12-1093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MARK HANNEN, Judge, 18th Judicial District, in his official capacity, TAMMY L. HERIVEL, Clerk of Arapahoe County, Colo., in her official capacity and JOHN W. SUTHERS, Colorado Attorney General, in his official capacity
Ontiveros-Perez v. Medina, et al
as 12-1074
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIO ONTIVEROS-PEREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA, Warden and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Self v. Milyard, et al
as 12-1072
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL G. SELF
Respondent - Appellee:
KEVIN MILYARD, Warden, Sterling Correctional Facility and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Brooks v. Medina, et al
as 12-1053
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEITH CLAYTON BROOKS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
ANGEL MEDINA and COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Tomlinson
as 12-1048
Respondent:
In re: COLORADO ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
RANDALL D. TOMLINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
