Cases 101 - 110 of 187
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00127
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00068
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00059
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00047
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00004
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
International Human Rights Commission v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 1:2018cv00065
Plaintiff:
International Human Rights Commission
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, United States Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1960
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mounkassa v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2017cv05105
Petitioner:
Adolphe Mounkassa
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security, US immigration and Custom Enforcement and The Office of Chief Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De Varona v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 5:2017cv00160
Petitioner:
Enrique De Varona
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General , Department of Homeland Security , U.S. ICE Field Office Director for the Miami Field Office and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
