Cases 101 - 110 of 115
Pham v. King County Housing Authority
as 2:2015cv00891
Plaintiff:
David Pham
Defendant:
King County Housing Authority , Doe 1, Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Casillas v. City of Seattle
as 2:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
Francisco Islas Casillas
Defendant:
City of Seattle , John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00579
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00582
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. DOES 1-28
as 2:2015cv00576
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Doe 1 et al
as 2:2015cv00581
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
Doe 1, Doe 2, Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC v. Does 1-39
as 2:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
Dallas Buyers Club, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Williams et al v. Starrag Group Holding AG et al
as 2:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams and Loriann Williams
Defendant:
Starrag Group Holding AG , Starrag AG , Starrag-Heckert, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinkley v. Vail et al
as 3:2012cv05969
Plaintiff:
James M Hinkley
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Scott Russell, Kerry Arlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canzoni v. Sutton et al
as 3:2012cv05921
Plaintiff:
Amas Canzoni and Tanana Canzoni
Defendant:
Lisa L. Sutton, Thurston County, Columbia State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
