Cases 101 - 110 of 223
DIXON v. JOHN DOE
as 2:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN DIXON, JR
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDSON v. LEPAGE et al
as 1:2016cv00079
Plaintiff:
ARLENE EDSON
Defendant:
PAUL L LEPAGE , RIVERVIEW PSYCHIATRIC CENTER , MAINE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DREWRY v. MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
BRANDON B DREWRY
Defendant:
MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOSEPH FITZPATRICK, RODNEY BOUFFARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOONAN v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv00014
Plaintiff:
SHANE NOONAN
Defendant:
YORK COUNTY, MAURICE OUELLETTE, JAY BONDAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARCH v. MILLS et al
as 2:2015cv00515
Plaintiff:
ANDREW MARCH
Defendant:
JANET T MILLS , CITY OF PORTLAND , WILLIAM PREIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE et al
as 2:2015cv00505
Plaintiff:
ORLANDO PEREZ
Defendant:
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE , ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY MAINE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT , CARSON CARVER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IRISH et al v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY IRISH and KIMBERLY IRISH
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE, STATE POLICE OF THE STATE OF MAINE and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES STATE POLICE OFFICERS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOODY v. JAIL STAFF AT CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2015cv00436
Plaintiff:
SCOTT L. BOODY
Defendant:
MIKE POMELEAU, KEVIN JOYCE, CUMBERLAND COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. USA
as 2:2015cv00407
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
