Cases 101 - 110 of 358
The Estate of David H. Brooks v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv24057
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau Of Prisons and The United States of America
Plaintiff:
The Estate of David H. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Allah v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2019cv00469
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gassew v. Federal Bureau of Prisons USP Coleman II et al
as 5:2019cv00472
Plaintiff:
John Neil Gassew and John Gassew
Defendant:
Federal Prison System, Warden, FCC Coleman, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Federal Bureau Of Prisons, et al
as 1:2019cv22887
Defendant:
Prison Guard, Official, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Marberry, et al
as 1:2019cv22891
Defendant:
Prison Guard, Official, Assistant Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gassew v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2019cv00227
Defendant:
Corrine Rios, Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
John Neil Gassew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TARSIA v. DOBBS et al
as 1:2019cv21654
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, FCI Miami and Brian Dobbs
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS TARSIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hair v. United States Of America et al
as 1:2019cv21614
Defendant:
FCI Miami (low) Warden, Director of US Federal Bureau of Prisons, State of Florida Attorney General and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Mathew Hair
Hinton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2019cv00169
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinton v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 8:2019cv00817
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Henderson Lewis Hinton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
