Cases 101 - 110 of 202
Furlano v. Warren County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Frank Thomas Furlano
Defendant:
Warren County, Kentucky , Jackie T. Strode , Shane Dobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Holland
as 6:2013cv00076
Petitioner:
Frank James Welch, Jr.
Respondent:
J.C. Holland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gaudioso v. Skechers U.S.A.,Inc.,
as 3:2013cv00210
Plaintiff:
Frank Gaudioso
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Account Receivable
Gognat v. The Hartford
as 3:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Frank Gognat
Defendant:
The Hartford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hopson v. Aguair Law Office et al
as 3:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
Aguair Law Office, Commonwealth of Kentucky, Weinburg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Weinburg et al
as 3:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
David Weinburg, Weinburg, Simpson, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hopson v. Secret Service et al
as 3:2012cv00770
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Hopson
Defendant:
Secret Service, FBI, Adam Solinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harris v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00775
Plaintiff:
Frank M Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Williams et al v. City of Shelbyville et al
as 3:2012cv00754
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Williams and Gardner Williams
Defendant:
City of Shelbyville, Shelbyville Police Dept., Robert A. Schutte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hopson v. Shakes
as 3:2012cv00728
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Hopson
Defendant:
James Shakes, County Clerks Office, Frank McScagui and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
