Cases 101 - 110 of 123
Sun-Dampier v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as CAN/3:19-CV-00819
Plaintiff:
Sun-Dampier
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Navarrete v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as 3:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Navarrete, Chad Wheeler, Diane Tyson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navarrete v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as CAN/3:19-CV-00767
Plaintiff:
Navarrete
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
RUSSELL et al v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
as 3:2019cv00395
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RUSSELL and JODI RUSSELL
Defendant:
HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC., COLGATE-PALMOLIVE COMPANY and HILL'S PET NUTRITION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RUSSELL et al v. HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
as FLN/3:19-CV-00395
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL
Defendant:
HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
Bone et al v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as NYE/1:19-CV-00831
Plaintiff:
Bone
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc
Bone et al v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00831
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 10, Hill's Pet Nutrition Sales, Inc., Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Janine Buckley, Christine Sawyer, Kelly Bone and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hamilton v. Hills Pet Nutrition, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02282
Plaintiff:
Camille Hamilton
Defendant:
Hills Pet Nutrition, Inc. and Crossmark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tamara Moore, et al v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., et al
as 18-15026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TAMARA MOORE, GRETA L. ERVIN, RAFF ARANDO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
MARS PETCARE US, INC., NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC. and others
Tamara Moore, et al v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., et al
as 18-15026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMARA MOORE, GRETA L. ERVIN, RAFF ARANDO and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MARS PETCARE US, INC., NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY, HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
