Cases 101 - 110 of 251
Iqbal v. Integra Staffing Services Inc et al
as 1:2018cv01947
Plaintiff:
Nusrath Iqbal
Defendant:
Integra Staffing Services Inc, Mohammed Jawed, Expert Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rodriguez v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01400
Plaintiff:
Luis Rodriguez
Defendant:
Thomas Dart , Cook County, Illinois , Jorelle Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01174
Plaintiff:
Odell Calvin
Defendant:
Thomas Dart , Cook County, Illinois , Jorelle R Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv01078
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taylor
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Pretty, Pam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
as 1:2017cv09300
Plaintiff:
Shaheena Khan
Defendant:
Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Patagonia, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2017cv08458
Plaintiff:
Patagonia, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Yanqing Ma, xuemei liu and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Hacker v. Cook County, Illinois et al
as 1:2017cv08093
Plaintiff:
Gerald Hacker
Defendant:
Cook County, Illinois , Thomas Dart , Fauzia Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. National Security Agency et al
as 1:2017cv08046
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Waqas Khan
Defendant:
National Security Agency , Federal Bureau of Investigation , John Does X and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
