Cases 101 - 110 of 4,038
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Correctional Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lee v. Mason et al
as 4:2023cv00799
Plaintiff:
Taji Lee
Defendant:
B. Mason, Corrections Officer Miller, Corrections Officer Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
NESTOR v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00807
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY HEALTH NETWORK, INC., ALLEGHENY COUNTY, THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL OVERSIGHT BOARD and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN LEE NESTOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
QUICK v. MR. CLAUSEN
as 2:2023cv01777
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE QUICK
Defendant:
MR. CLAUSEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUICK v. RACHUBA
as 2:2023cv01778
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE QUICK
Defendant:
MR. RACHUBA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ v. MATTHEWS et al
as 2:2023cv01757
Plaintiff:
DANNY AMEN ANDERSON VALENTINE SHABAZZ
Defendant:
ELIZABETH MATTHEWS, LUCIAN GRAINGE, ASCAP AMERICAN SOCIETY OF COMPOSERS AND AUTHORS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
LEE v. WELLPATH
as 2:2023cv01682
Defendant:
WELLPATH and CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COLLYMORE v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2023cv00709
Petitioner:
Derrell Collymore
Respondent:
LEE ESTOCK, C.O. George, C/O. JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
QUICK v. MR. RACHUBA
as 2:2023cv01637
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE QUICK
Defendant:
MR. RACHUBA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
QUICK v. BOGAN
as 2:2023cv01636
Plaintiff:
EDDIE LEE QUICK
Defendant:
MR. BOGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
