Cases 101 - 110 of 313
Dennis Foy v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2270
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS FOY
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Rockview, Bellefonte, PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Piskanin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kenneth Cameron and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Piskanin v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2013cv01191
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Piskanin
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Kenneth Cameron and Marirosa Lamas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem George v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM GEORGE
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAMS v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv02370
Petitioner:
ALEEM WILLIAMS
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SUTTON v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv02240
Petitioner:
LEWIS SUTTON
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Givens v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2098
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GIVENS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Khalif Thomas v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2082
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHALIF THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS and DR. TEJEDA
Gregory Saunders v. Marirosa Lamas, et al
as 13-2052
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SAUNDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
MARIROSA LAMAS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
GREGG v. LAMAS et al
as 2:2013cv00516
Petitioner:
DARROLL GREGG
Respondent:
MARIROSA LAMAS and KATHLEEN G. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
