Cases 101 - 110 of 228
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. $55,115.00 in United States Currency et al
as 1:2014cv03089
Defendant:
$55,115.00 in United States Currency , 2011 Cadillac Escalade, VIN: 1GYS4BEF5BR104322 , 1968 Chevy Camaro SS, VIN: 124378N33932 and others
Claimant:
The Ultimate Machines Incorporated , Leandro Gamboa , Denise Gamboa and others
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Medina v. Denver Parole Office et al
as 1:2014cv03037
Plaintiff:
Nick Raul Medina
Defendant:
Denver Parole Office, Genie Cannaham, Julie David and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Jefferson County Courts, Colo.
as 1:2014cv02894
Respondent:
Jefferson County Courts, Colo.
Petitioner:
Nick Raul Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jara et al v. Medina, Sr.
as 1:2014cv02701
Plaintiff:
Alfredo "Oscar" Jara and Hugo Esparza
Defendant:
George Medina, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Danielson-Grodin, et al v. Raemisch, et al
as 1:2014cv02704
Plaintiff:
Mary Danielson-Grodin, Matt Lincoln, John Demming and others
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Lou Archuleta, SCF Mailroom, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Medina v. Medina et al
as 1:2014rj00015
Plaintiff:
Romero Medina and Melissa G. Medina
Defendant:
Apollo Credit Agency, Inc.
Roemer et al v. Carochi et al
as 1:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Heather Roemer and Samantha McClellan
Defendant:
Tony Carochi, Kevin Milyard, Lou Archuleta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Clark v. Colorado Department of Corrections
as 1:2014cv01594
Plaintiff:
Willie Dwayne Clark
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, Angel Medina and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
