Cases 101 - 110 of 184
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02547
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DEJESUS et al v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
as 2:2013cv04940
Plaintiff:
CARL A. DEJESUS, CARL TALTON and PIERRE FOLKS
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PIERRE-LOUIS et al v. WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
as 2:2013cv03503
Plaintiff:
JEAN F. PIERRE-LOUIS and MARIE B. PIERRE-LOUIS
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 260
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01441
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
JEAN-GILLES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv02109
Plaintiff:
MAX JEAN-GILLES , TITUS ADAMS , MIRANDA ADAMS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pierre-Louis v. United States Of America
as 3:2013cv00878
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Pierre-Louis
Defendant:
United States Of America
Mediator:
Mediator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JACOBS v. COOK et al
as 1:2013cv00538
Plaintiff:
Kennith Alonzo Jacobs
Defendant:
Cook, J.J. Mitchell, Funelli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cidone v. USA
as 3:2013cv00361
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pierre Cidone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
JACOBS v. COOK et al
as 2:2013cv00615
Plaintiff:
KENNITH ALONZO JACOBS
Defendant:
COOK, J.J. MITCHELL, FUNELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
