Cases 101 - 110 of 135
Canada v. R & R Property Officer Salis
as 4:2011cv05161
Plaintiff:
Ronald Canada
Defendant:
R & R Property Officer Salis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Juarez v. Chacon et al
as 3:2011cv04631
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Juarez
Defendant:
R. Chacon, G. Williamson, L. Langran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arceo v. DVI, et al
as 2:2011cv02396
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arceo
Defendant:
Socorro Salinas, Martinez, Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J Raymond McCoy v. Ernest C Roe, et al
as 2:2003cv02393
Defendant:
J A Agamao, Robert G Alvarado, M Attygalla and others
HCM:
Sudhir Bagga, T Dillard, II, Martin Levin and others
MTA:
Gilda Brown, George Diaz and E Tell
MCAA:
Beth Deliberto
CMO:
Robert M Johnson
Plaintiff:
J Raymond McCoy
HSA:
M Monteiro, -
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bhavna Rohera et al v. Raytheon Aircraft Company et al
as 2:2011cv02530
Defendant:
Does, General Aviation Modifications Inc, Kelly Aerospace Inc and others
Plaintiff:
A. R., R. R. and Bhavna Rohera
Jose Guerrero v. R R Donnelley & Sons Company et al
as 5:2010cv01560
Defendant:
Does and R R Donnelley & Sons Company
Plaintiff:
Jose Guerrero
R & R Pipeline Inc. v. Rick Garcia et al
as 2:2010cv07652
Defendant:
American Safety Casualty Insurance Company, Does and Rick Garcia
Plaintiff:
R & R Pipeline Inc.
Lau v. Harrington et al
as 1:2010cv01779
Plaintiff:
Hon Lau
Defendant:
K. Harrington, R & R Dept. Staff, C. Chen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roel Centeno v. M E Banaga Bugatin et al
as 3:2010cv01947
Plaintiff:
Roel Centeno
Defendant:
Banaga Bugatin, A Mendez, L Marquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roel Centeno v. M E Banaga Bugatin et al
as 2:2010cv06844
Defendant:
M E Banaga Bugatin, M E Banaga Bugatin, Burgenic and others
Plaintiff:
Roel Centeno
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
