Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 2,837
Becker v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv06900
Plaintiff: Patricia A Becker
Defendant: Huntington Ingalls Incorporated, Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., Albert L Bossier, Jr and others
Cross Defendant: Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LP and Eagle, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: Paramount Global, Uniroyal Inc., Manville Personal Injury Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lucas v. Lloyds of London, et al
as 2:2023cv06860
Plaintiff: Andrea Lucas
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Subscribing to Policy No. DHO01426, Lloyds of London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Gaidry & Thompson Properties, LLC v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv06864
Plaintiff: Gaidry Thompson Properties, LLC
Defendant: Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority No. B604510568622021 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Counter Defendant: Gaidry & Thompson Properties, LLC
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Type: Contract Insurance
Lloyd's America, Inc. et al v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2023cv04306
Plaintiff: Lloyd's America, Inc., The Corporation of Lloyd's and Corporation of Lloyd's
Defendant: Eric Ramirez, Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London, Inc. and Certain Underwriters of Lloyds London, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Kelly Property, LLC v. Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's London et al
as 2:2023cv06836
Plaintiff: Kelly Property, LLC
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at LLoyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No. B1180D200896/2236LA, Hamilton Insurance Designated Activity Company and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
v. Mohme et al
as 1:2023cv00428
Not Classified By Court: Larry Mohme and Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Policy No. OUA 10077538-00
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Mohme v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Policy No. OUA 10077538-00
as 1:2023cv00429
Plaintiff: Larry Mohme
Defendant: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London Policy No. OUA 10077538-00
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Foundation Church Inc v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv01019
Plaintiff: Foundation Church Inc
Defendant: Independent Specialty Insurance Company, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and Other Insurers Subscribing to Binding Authority B604510568622021
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Russell v. Underwriters at LLoyd's London
as 2:2023cv06786
Plaintiff: Amin Russell
Defendant: Certain Underwriters LLoyd's London and Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Interested Party: Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Lewis et al v. Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv06764
Plaintiff: Brouney Lewis, Monica Kelly-Lewis, Levar Lewis and others
Cross Defendant: Taylor-Seidenbach, Inc., General Electric Company, Redco Corporation and others
Defendant: Kohler Co., Flow Smart Inc., Albert Bossier and others
Cross Claimant: Huntington Ingalls, Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant: International Paper Company, Paramount Global, Hopeman Brothers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?