Cases 101 - 110 of 188
Lawrence v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv00922
Plaintiff:
Horace Lawrence
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Thomas et al
as 2:2013cv00910
Petitioner:
Reginald Renard Reed
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv00903
Plaintiff:
Milton Jones
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Kim Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clancy v. Thomas et al
as 7:2013cv00766
Petitioner:
Myron Clancy
Respondent:
Willie Thomas and Attorney General for the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perdue v. Moore et al
as 7:2013cv00727
Plaintiff:
Carlos Perdue
Defendant:
Katrina Moore, Willie Thomas, John Hutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reeder v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Reeder
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Brown
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atwood v. Thomas
as 1:2012cv00767
Petitioner:
Sean Gaston Atwood
Respondent:
Willie Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luckey v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv03852
Plaintiff:
Jessie Lee Luckey
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and John Hutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guest v. Thomas et al
as 7:2012cv03574
Plaintiff:
Michael Guest
Defendant:
Willie Thomas and Luther Strange
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
