Cases 101 - 110 of 268
Allen et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02646
Plaintiff:
Linda Allen , Anthony Atkins , Joann Bevins and others
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv02330
Plaintiff:
Thomas Scott Wood
Defendant:
Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Aldrete v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv01769
Plaintiff:
Francisco Javier Aldrete, II
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Ruashing, Unknown Rielly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01691
Plaintiff:
Keresha Woods
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones #190298 v. Nash et al
as 2:2017cv01547
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown Woods and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eardley v. Norman et al
as 2:2017mc00031
Defendant:
Vicki L Wood, Mark F Norman and Vicki L Norman
Plaintiff:
Marianne Eardley
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Woods v. Prescott Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv08073
Plaintiff:
Dustin Micheal Woods
Defendant:
Malcolm Wilkinson, A Santana and Jeff Newnum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Scissons
as 3:2017cv08038
Plaintiff:
Dustin Micheal Woods
Defendant:
Jason Scissons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City of Phoenix Police Department et al
as 2:2017cv00157
Plaintiff:
Lenon D Thomas
Defendant:
City of Phoenix Police Department, Joshua M Roper and Brian C Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv04428
Plaintiff:
Barbara Woods
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
