Cases 101 - 110 of 120
Calcote v. Pruett et al
as 2:2010cv00247
Plaintiff:
Alfred Ray Calcote
Defendant:
John Pruett, Emmitt Sparkman, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2010cv00148
Petitioner:
Lakeith Dorsey
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2010cv00101
Petitioner:
Ismael Harris
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Readus v. Sparkman
as 3:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Readus
Defendant:
Emmitt Sparkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2010cv00132
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Wallace
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wallace v. Sparkman et al
as 2:2010cv00128
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Wallace
Respondent:
Emmitt Sparkman and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jerry Warner v. Larry Hardy, et al
as 10-60170
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY LEE WARNER
Respondent - Appellee:
LARRY HARDY, KENTRELL LIDDELL, M.D., RON WOODALL and others
Hope v. Robinson et al
as 2:2009cv00207
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Hope
Defendant:
Unknown Robinson, Ron Woodall, Ronald King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luckett v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2009cv00583
Plaintiff:
Alvin V. Luckett, Jr.
Defendant:
John Hopkins, Chris Epps, Emmitt Sparkman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kirby Tate v. Earnestine Starks, et al
as 09-60384
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRBY TATE
Defendant - Appellee:
EARNESTINE STARKS, Sergeant, Unit 29-B, in Her Individual and Official Capacity, REGINA CAPLERS, Lieutenant, Disciplinary Officer, in Her Official Capacity, RICKY SCOTT, CID Investigator, in His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
