Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,122,994
Hasher v. City of Rochester et al
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff: Nathanial James Hasher
Defendant: City of Rochester, Officer Edward Fritz, Officer Faudskar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gordy v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03074
Plaintiff: Michael J Gordy
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thunstrom v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00171
Plaintiff: Angela Thunstrom
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Donini v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03073
Plaintiff: Linda A Donini
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rios v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00172
Plaintiff: Dessirae M Rios
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ranchod v. AIG Property Casualty Company
as 2:2024cv00699
Plaintiff: Suresh U Ranchod
Defendant: AIG Property Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Type: Contract Insurance
Bacon et al v. Grand Design RV, LLC
as 3:2024cv05384
Plaintiff: George R Bacon and Kimberly Bacon
Defendant: Grand Design RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sampson v. Dockside Marine Systems, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00700
Plaintiff: Deondre Sampson
Defendant: Dockside Marine Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Whybark v. Whalen et al
as 2:2024cv00692
Plaintiff: Marcus Whybark
Defendant: Carl D. Whalen and Kenneth P. Fredericksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mora v. Seattle Housing Authority
as 2:2024cv00698
Plaintiff: Olivia Mora
Defendant: Seattle Housing Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?