Cases 101 - 110 of 31,113
Enos v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Tracy Enos
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Laramie v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Savannah Laramie
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Travis John Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Haik v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Marla Gay Haik
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
White v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Matthew J White
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Robinson v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Brandy Marie Robinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Bohl v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Kristie M. Bohl
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Brown v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Sonya N Brown
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Harenza v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv05023
Plaintiff:
Theresa Jo Harenza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Morton v. O'Malley
as 6:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Jazmon Lyn-Arveda Morton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
