Cases 101 - 110 of 102,631
Lester v. Lumpkin
as 5:2024cv00470
Petitioner:
Timmy Heath Lester
Respondent:
Director of TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Paxton
as 6:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Markiesha (Mark) Bailey
Defendant:
Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tryon v. Bell County Law Enforcement Center
as 6:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Eric De'Monee Tryon
Defendant:
Bell County Law Enforcement Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trejo v. Salazar
as 5:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Anthony Robert Trejo
Respondent:
Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alexander v. Correctional Managed Health Care et al
as 4:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Darrold Alexander
Defendant:
Correctional Managed Health Care, Dr. Lannette Linthicum, Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyna v. USA
as 1:2024cv00036
Petitioner:
Eliseo Antonio Reyna
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Dailey v. TDCJ
as 6:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Anthony Ray Dailey
Respondent:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Salas v. Ramirez et al
as 4:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Salas
Defendant:
FNU Ramirez, Kristine Carouth and Tarrant County Corrections Center Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langwell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Weston Scott Langwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
