Cases 101 - 110 of 5,143
Thomas v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01318
Plaintiff:
Kenny R. Thomas
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cage v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Eric Anthony Cage
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2023cv00681
Plaintiff:
Robert Young
Defendant:
Tony Mancuso, Toney Edwards, Eric Stott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2023cv01416
Petitioner:
Rodrick Coleman and Dre
Respondent:
State of Louisiana and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricks v. State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, West Feliciana Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carmouche v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
Deshon M. Carmouche
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perrillioux v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv00674
Plaintiff:
Charles Perrillioux
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Julio Melendez
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
as 3:2023cv00642
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant:
Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Michael Wright
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
