Cases 101 - 110 of 67,449
Byrne v. Commure, Inc.
as 1:2024cv11162
Plaintiff:
Samantha Byrne
Defendant:
Commure, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rooney v. Leerink Partners, LLC
as 1:2024cv11165
Plaintiff:
Mairin Rooney
Defendant:
Leerink Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Spurlock v. Covidien LP et al
as 1:2024cv11160
Plaintiff:
Deborah D. Spurlock
Defendant:
Covidien LP and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pitts v. DiPierro et al
as 1:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Simone Pitts
Defendant:
Girolamo DiPierro and GMB Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Gardner v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40067
Petitioner:
Robert Gardner
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Das v. IRobot Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv11158
Plaintiff:
DYLAN DAS
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Colin M. Angle and JULIE ZEILER
Piercy et al v. AT&T Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv10608
Plaintiff:
LaNell Piercy, Willa G. Ward, Thomas L. Mazzeo and others
Defendant:
AT&T Inc., AT&T Services, Inc. and State Street Global Advisors Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
SPIN-Learning, LLC et al v. Ascend Learning, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv10583
Plaintiff:
SPIN-Learning, LLC and Bridgette Bryan
Defendant:
Ascend Learning, LLC, Assessment Technologies Institute, L.L.C., Scott Novorr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
