Cases 101 - 110 of 88,743
Jones v. Dixie Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02288
Plaintiff:
Justin Lavell Jones
Defendant:
Dixie Transport, Inc. and Ricky Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Ledford v. Hensley et al
as 2:2024cv00071
Plaintiff:
Randall Eugene Ledford
Defendant:
Mike Hensley, Walmart Unicoi, Aaron Embler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe v. Shelby County Board of Education
as 2:2023cv02810
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Burns v. Evergreen Design & Construction, LLC
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Duane Burns
Defendant:
Evergreen Design & Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tinsley et al v. Walmart, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Shrayln Tinsley and Philip Tinsley
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. doing business as Sam's Club, Sam's West, Inc. and Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wood et al v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Dennis Wood and Deanna Wood
Defendant:
Wesley Oliver, Ezra Oliver and Oliver Livestock, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Reese v. Future Restaurants, LLC
as 3:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Christopher Reese
Defendant:
Future Restaurants, LLC doing business as Taco Bell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reguli et al v. Hetzel et al
as 3:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Connie Reguli and Wendy Hancock
Defendant:
Tracy Hetzel, Estate of Kimberly Helper, Mary Katherine Evins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00543
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #039 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Doe #039
Defendant:
William Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
