Cases 101 - 110 of 1,704
Carroll et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Javis Carroll and Tonya Carroll
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Olson et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Tracy Olson and Irene Michelle Olson
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage/Product Liability
Carlson v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Paige M. Carlson
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Hart v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2021cv03301
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Hart
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
McCoy v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2021cv03305
Plaintiff:
Kathleen McCoy
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Boston v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 1:2021cv03298
Plaintiff:
Lucille Boston, on behalf of the Estate of Boston R Lang, Lucille Boston, on behalf of the Estate of Lang R. Boston and Lucille Boston
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 MDL: Products Liability
Gouveia et al v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2021cv03239
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GOUVEIA and MARY GOUVEIA
Defendant:
Smith and Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2021cv03157
Plaintiff:
Ronda Brown and Randy Brown
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gerald et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc.
as 1:2021cv03082
Plaintiff:
Robert Gerald and Jeanne Marie Gerald
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowdermilk v. Depuy Synthes Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv03067
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lowdermilk
Defendant:
Depuy Synthes Products, Inc. and Depuy Synthes Sales, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
