Cases 111 - 120 of 20,714
Pollard-El Jr. v. Allen et al
as 4:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Byron Pollard-El Jr.
Defendant:
Richard Adam Allen and Unknown Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. USA
as 6:2024cv03084
Petitioner:
Dawuan White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. City of Kansas City, MO
as 4:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Jermel Arcilicia Taylor
Defendant:
City of Kansas City, MO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chilton v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Brett Michaels Chilton
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DeMun D. Walker
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Missouri Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Criner v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
Phillip Criner
Defendant:
Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Sheriff Birk et al
as 2:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Robert Avery
Defendant:
Sheriff Birk and Steve Hiate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2024cv00417
Plaintiff:
Vincel Chambers
Defendant:
St. Louis County, 21st Judicial Circuit Court and Wesley Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Richards
as 5:2024cv06046
Plaintiff:
Ashley Nelson
Defendant:
Todd Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Naylor v. Judge Wagner, et al
as 5:2024cv06047
Plaintiff:
Aaron L Naylor
Defendant:
Judge Wagner, Missouri Department of Corrections, Crossroads Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
