Cases 111 - 120 of 486
Stade v. Oregon Department of Human Services et al
as 3:2021cv01217
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Stade
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Human Services, Oregon Department of Justice, Multnomah County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Girard v. Battin et al
as 3:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
lacy girard
Defendant:
Jason Battin, Colette Peters, Brian Belleque and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Sasha Marie Woods
Defendant:
Deputy Shane Mitchell, Deputy Jane Doe and Deputy John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodroffe v. Lincoln County Community Justice et al
as 6:2021cv01053
Plaintiff:
Robert Woodroffe
Defendant:
Lincoln County Community Justice, Tony Campa, Susie O'Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shields v. Blewett et al
as 2:2021cv01001
Plaintiff:
Paul Kay Shields
Defendant:
Tyler Blewett, Ms. Elmore, FNU K. Ramsay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Sanne
as 6:2021cv00997
Plaintiff:
Benjimin Edward Smith
Defendant:
Jason Meyer, Marion County Sheriffs Office and Medical Staff at Jail, Sgt Cherno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avalos-Corona v. Peters et al
as 6:2021cv00939
Defendant:
Joshua Wagner, Ruben Benavidez, Erica Sage and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Avalos-Corona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slight v. Peters et al
as 2:2021cv00925
Defendant:
Colette S. Peters, Sue Washburn, C. Kairos and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Martin Slight, IV
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe, et al v. McFall, et al
as 1:2021cv00865
Defendant:
The City of Medford and Officer McFall
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Suzanne Mendelsen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scriber v. Peters et al
as 3:2021cv00858
Defendant:
John/Jane 1-10 Doe, John/Jane 21-30 Doe, John/Jane 11-20 Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alysha Scriber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
