Cases 111 - 120 of 685
Getman v. Saul
as 5:2020cv01630
Plaintiff:
Melanie L. Getman
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Smiley et al v. Cuomo et al
as 9:2020cv01624
Defendant:
Priscilla Ledbetter, Anthony J. Annucci, Anne Jocelyn and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron L. Mosley and Rashon Smiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamphere v. Saul
as 6:2020cv01576
Plaintiff:
Nicole Lee Lamphere
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Menzies v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01600
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Menzies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gallivan et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Petitioner:
KMT MANAGEMENT, INC., TACO COCINE ELLICOTT, LLC, EXPO MARKET, INC. and others
Respondent:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Department of Health and New York State Liquor Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Gallivan et al v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
KMT MANAGEMENT, INC., TACO COCINE ELLICOTT, LLC, WNY BEER CLUB, LLC and others
Respondent:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State Department of Health and New York State Liquor Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Lonecke Jr. v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10794
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Lonecke Jr.
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Farino v. Saul
as 5:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Ashley J. Farino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Molina v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Adiylah Molina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Velez v. Saul
as 1:2020cv10282
Plaintiff:
Pedro Juan Velez
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
