Cases 111 - 120 of 170
POWELL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2010cv00793
Petitioner:
JAMES POWELL
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALVIN KELLER and SANDRA THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Waddell v. Department of Correction et al
as 3:2010cv00532
Petitioner:
Larry Waddell
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Alvin Keller and Herbert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HOLCOMB v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2010cv00791
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ALVIN KELLER and BUTCH JACKSON
Petitioner:
BARRY HOLCOMB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Dollar v. Keller et al
as 5:2010cv00156
Petitioner:
David Lee Dollar
Defendant:
Alvin W. Keller
Respondent:
David Mitchell and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richardson v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010hc02228
Petitioner:
LeRoy Richardson
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Alvin Keller and Herbert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Powell v. Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010hc02227
Petitioner:
James Powell
Respondent:
Department of Correction, Alvin Keller and Sandra Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baggett v. Keller et al
as 5:2010hc02226
Petitioner:
William Baggett
Respondent:
Alvin Keller, Joseph Hall and Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darden v. N.C. Department of Correction
as 5:2010hc02216
Petitioner:
Joey L. Darden
Respondent:
N.C. Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bumgarner et al v. North Carolina Department of Correction et al
as 5:2010ct03166
Plaintiff:
Chad Bumgarner , Edmund Gaud , Raymond Hall and others
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Correction, Alvin W. Keller, Robert Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Sapp v. North Carolina Department of Corrections
as 3:2010cv00405
Petitioner:
Donald Lee Sapp, Jr.
Respondent:
North Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
