Cases 111 - 120 of 1,606
Ruelas v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03159
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Ruelas
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coward v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03165
Plaintiff:
John Ondray Coward, Jr.
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foran v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03152
Plaintiff:
Sean Timothy Foran
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peter v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03153
Plaintiff:
Talon X Peter
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rojel v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03161
Plaintiff:
Alejandro R Rojel
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendoza v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03155
Plaintiff:
Heriberto Mendoza
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stencel v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03164
Plaintiff:
John Stencel
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03050
Plaintiff:
Trevon Sparks
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunkentell v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03018
Plaintiff:
Charles Dunkentell
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparks v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2017cv03041
Plaintiff:
Trevon Dwayne Sparks
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
